DO ART WRONG: Artist’s (Watercolour Paper) Block
Therefore, I have a lot of empty sketchbooks. Many of them are made for watercolour, which I used to do a whole lot more of than line art but have kinda sorta forgotten how to do now. As it happens, I have a lot of watercolour paints. Last week/month/year I went to the art store for comicking supplies and saw there was a 50%-off inventory-clearance sale (old-formula-pigment Quinacridone yellow to be had for less than the day’s coffee and morning cinnamon danish? I mean, who can say no to old-formula-pigment Quinacrindone yellow, amirite). But I realised that if I bought it, that too would go in the drawer with the supplies that aren’t used up because I’m always, always afraid to DO ART WRONG.
So, to get past this, I assigned the sketchbooks a purpose: In January, once a day, I’ll do variations of a subject in each of several sketchbooks; and not as an end in itself, not trying to do the Arting right, but to a technical and practical use–to determine the paper that best suits investing in more of the same. For the time when I might want to do a real sketch journal or go out for some for reals urban sketching or really use those fancy-palette watercolours in the way they deserve. It’s not that I’m messing up sketchbook pages so they won’t be inspiring carnets for others to see. This is specifically the task of figuring out which paper I like best. I’m trying spiral bound pads, and those economy watercolour paper blocks that are glued down on the sides and give you mad deep papercuts when you loosen a sheet, and softcover sketchbooks that come several to the shrink-wrapped package, and hardbound journals like what those urban sketchers use, and if the art is so-so–or so, so bad–so what. That’s not what this is for. This purpose does not include “BE PERFECT” anywhere in the description.
The sketchbooks, at least, have found a meaning in life for 2017.
Yesterday I only used Sennelier paints, plus that of Daniel Smith Quinacridone Gold. This is on Cotman Montval 300gsm cold press paper:
Things I don’t plan to fret about just at the moment: perfect uniform details; perfect body proportions; perfect use of colour; colour theory (don’t get me started; at least, not in this post). The sloppiness isn’t bothering me at all, nope nope nope. I do need to care about skin tone–this particular paint sometimes dries paler than I’d expect, but I wanted to scan the drawing before I go back in with another glaze to fix Felix’s pallor. Maybe adding a layer will mess up the drawing, but, hey, that doesn’t bother me, nopey nope nopers, not at all I tell you.
On Arches 300gsm cold press watercolour pad, not going to get fussed about the wacky skin tone tests here either:
Pencils with washes, paint over waterproof ink, seeing how that works on the Arches paper:
This paper–Fluid 4×6-inch “Easy Block” cold press–I’ve deemed inexpensive enough to use for itty bitty test sketches and mixing and layering tests. Do I care that the sketch is completely wonky no of course I do not ha ha ha it’s fine no really i am ok with this:
Next test piece in progress in a Strathmore 400 series 300gsm watercolour sketchbook:
Semi-Related Recommendation: If you love the love of history and archaeology and discovery, and are in the mood for a quietly (and sometimes outrageously) funny comedy, try Detectorists, created by actor/writer/director Mackenzie Crook (The Office, Pirates of the Caribbean). It’s available in the US on Netflix. It gave me all the feels there are. It made me want to stick with something I love, even if it breaks my heart sometimes, even if it means ruining a perfect sketchbook cover. @detectorists
Happy New Year Klio!
I won’t claim to have understood your entire rant but your sketches are good as usual, even your wonky one! The wonky one is 10000 times better than any of mine during my artistic phase when I was 10 – 13 years old.
I specially like the last two Felix images: pencil and color “elf” Felix.
I’d argue that your details on things like clothing and equipment are just fine. I was going to fuss about the length of Felix’s cingulum militare (seemed too short, to me…) but after looking around it looks like the length of the “tassels” tended to vary a lot (which makes sense, given the variety of local makes across the Empire…). So, go, you.
The thing that always gigs me about the Roman miles is the gladius worn WAY the hell up on the right side. Seems unnatural, given that a right-handed fighter (and a close-order infantryman would HAVE to be right-handed except perhaps for the far-right-hand ranker – otherwise you’d interfere with each other) would naturally draw from the left.
But…if your shield is on your left side and it’s pressed into your body you couldn’t draw from the left. As difficult as it would be to reach up and draw from the right side it’d be easier than trying to pull it out from underneath your shield in tight space…
Just reminds me that the guys who came up with this stuff did it for a living and had good reasons for things that look strange to me.